Saturday, January 22, 2011

Is my view on progressive taxes refuted yet

My challenge is based upon minimally redundant government.  Local government emerges from the spontaneous organization of individuals to overcome the bundling problem on property.  It is inefficient to partition property costs, like competitive sewer services. The monopoly managed on a per use fee by free association.

Local governments are grouped by wealth bands, if we prefer grouping by wealth. So, the free association of local communities to solve the central bundling process actually resulting the additional fee per use. Which ends up a flat fee on net present value.  We get minimal central government with very progressive taxes, and banding by wealth and local government chosen by free association.  But central government would be void of entitlements.

Our problem is free association at the local level is blocked by fixed state boundaries.  We should make them flexible every five years, and if we do that we can keep the Senate.  Allow local congressional districts to reorganize state boundaries by democratic contiguous congregation. 

That would make us competitive.

No comments: