The reason I get order mixed, mostly, is because I often thing in ordering by the small factions to smaller fractions, or sometimes order by smallest whole number and go up. I have not set any standard, will likely will remain confused on the issue. But, the Compton wavelength for large matter is small wavelength and high frequency.
If we go with 3/2 up, instead of 2/3 down, then we are more conformal with the Fibonacci standard. That makes Higgs the high order, we order by large mass to small.
The other way around, the vacuum layer then has to deal with huge Nulls to make small mass. It should deal with a small bit of null. So we cannot easily set the vacuum to some small error without a lot of arithmetic, its like inverting Plank.
If we count Null as the smallest unit of potential mass, then Higgs has the most Nulls and highest frequency. Nulls correspond to frequency. Higgs is high order, Nyquist is low order. We count down to small mass by order? I am still working this issue, but I want the packing to be easy to visualize. Low order has small quantization levels, and large wavelength. So when large mass eneter a low order system, we have to inverth the nulls and get freuqency to see what happens. But when we have low order wave penetrationg large mass, it is much easier to see what happens. So the Nulls correspond to frequency when packed.
One way or the other I am going to be confused.
No comments:
Post a Comment