Saturday, March 22, 2014

Redshift and the magic of SpaceTime

The farther we look, the redder things seem.  That must be true, they say, because the 377, the impedance, of space is everywhere the same, unless SpaceTime changed that also.  How did empty space acquire the magical property of impedance?

The frequency of light is determined by the rate as which positive and negate phase are dumped into space. The so called impedance is a property of the source, the relative quantization ratios of of magnetic and charge sourced.  What determines those ratios? The structure of the atom.

There are three frequencies involved here, one is the originating light frequency, likely an atom, and the other two are the relative quant ratios, from the source.  This light travels some 10 billion light year through space, and we expect the vacuum to be near perfect, maintaining the quantization ratios all the way along.  What it those two field ratios got smaller? Light still move at its proper rate, but it originating freuqency drops, it looks redder.

Those phase dumps along the 10 ten million light year path fall off as 1/r2, did you know that? It would be a miracle it the vacuum did not lose a bit of phase dump over that period. We are simply seeing a bit of charge loss from the magnetic or the electrical.  The vacuum is not that perfect, certainly not more perfect than planks constant. Do the numbers:

 This is plank in meters.  1.616199 (97) x10 -35 
Light travels 3e8 meters per second. One year is years is: 31e7 seconds.
So, 90e15 meters. The next galaxy is a million light years, 1e6 or 90e21 total .   A,Multiply by plank, which is error per meter:  150 e-14 meters.   the wavelength of light, about 500e-9. Include the 1/(r**2) dimming effect, and you are swamped.  That is too far for empty space to maintain frequency. Its a miracle you can see anything.  Plank is not just our error, mother nature has the same problem.

Then, of course, there is the dark energy hypothesis. If you believe in dark energy all over space, then you are certainly uncertain about the red shift being related to separation velocity.

 

No comments: