Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Relative probability of state changes

That would be the difference between an integer solution to Shannon and the closest solution to an integer.  It says, that over the incomplete sequence, the quantization levels have some overlap. So in the quark system, the mass states and the wave states make the best match at the current generation. They cannot perfectly match as wave quantization ratios were different than mass quantization. The sequence is incomplete because of the balance between Plank, the wave quantization ratio, and the mass quantization ratio. The point where balance is acceptable is the point where Plank is closest to its value.

So, if we knew the relative quantization ratios (between wave and mass), and we knew Plank, then we can count down from Higgs and pick the points where the difference between perfect entropy and actual entropy is minimum, and thus lay out the entire mass/wave set thru the proton.

My conjecture that the wave quantizations go as the Fibonacci angle seem to bear out because the maximum entropy points occur when  the Shannon index is a multiple of three. My quantization angle for mass is a bit more of a suspicious, but comes close to the quark system of taking three, two at a time. This model is more right than wrong, especially since it works from the vacuum up to the Black Hole. Theoretically, if we believe in maximum entropy, and we think Shannon has nailed that; then, adjusting for quantization ratios, it must work.

No comments: