Monday, April 28, 2014

This one bothers me

E = h\nu \,.
In 1905 the value (E), the energy of a charged atomic oscillator, was theoretically associated with the energy of the electromagnetic wave itself, representing the minimum amount of energy required to form an electromagnetic field (a "quantum"). Further investigation of quanta revealed behaviour associated with an independent unit ("particle") as opposed to an electromagnetic wave and was eventually given the term photon.

Great, the atomic orbital carry energy, and emits light.  And that means the energy of the orbital is proportional to the frequency of emitted light. It is not incorrect, it is just that the physicist is letting the atom compute the energy, and energy is not decomposed.  The orbital of the atom is not devoid of free nulls, in my theory. The kinetic energy is a partial fraction of free nulls and wave motion.  So the physicists can easily be confused if he cannot decompose these two and back out the virtual Compton wave/null ratio for the orbit. Later, when the light hits a region of space where the original conditions are not met, he has to do the General Relativity thing, to decompose and renormalize.

The other term inside the Plank joules/sec is the DeBroglie relation, p*wavelength = plank. So, real energy should be:

m*f^2,

Compton mass * Compton frequency squared, gives the mass energy equivalence at the speed of light.  

When the wave leaves the atom, it is still pushing pulling null, not enough to make matter, but enough cause the Signal to Noise issues relative to free space. Light is still constant in free space, but without the other term, we can only approximate the wave spread. So light curves in gravity, it makes a different entropy relation.  It is not, either particle or wave; it is particle and fractional wave, or wave and fractional particle. That is why we get action at a distance. That is why we do the general relativity, that is why there is inherent noise in the vacuum, and that is why quantum mechanics need not be perfect Euclidean in its groups. That is why the proton is so flexible, it can alter, within some bound, its embedded phase and exposed phase, and that is why you cannot find the mass in the quark. And, that is why we have Heisenberg uncertainty. Also, look how Einstein added the second term to Planks model of the vacuum energy.

No comments: