Thursday, May 15, 2014

Light is always the most irrational number in any system of physics

I think this was proved by group theorists. Any system that measures the laws of physics, or anything else, is inherently dealing with finite groups, a finite number line, or a finite number of terms in the power series. Under these conditions, if light were a multiple, then it would be trapped in a potential barrier, or part of a potential barrier, or in engineering units, would be dividing by zero somewhere. It is simply a result of measuring things. In Shannon theory, light is the relative sample rate, and cannot sample itself.

The real assumption we make, possibly incorrectly, is that light always has the same precision.  My theory makes that assumption, and Einstein's theory makes that assumption. The only group that violates that assumption are the Big Bangers, they have things happening with more precision than light can support.

When light  is less precise, then fewer groups are formed, the number line is too curved.

This galaxy has hydrogen, so we can expect that the precision of light and the galaxy correspond to our expectations. This galaxy is also the furthest galaxy away, they say. But the Big Bangers require us to believe that this similar precision of light was first established, to begin the sequence, then destroyed, to complete the sequence.  That is a conundrum.


Michelson–Morley experiment
By analyzing the return speed of light in different directions at various different times, it was thought to be possible to measure the motion of the Earth relative to the aether. The expected relative difference in the measured speed of light was quite small, given that the velocity of the Earth in its orbit around the Sun was about one hundredth of one percent of the speed of light.

The experiment performed was based on the assumption that any aether would alter the shape of matter, when measured by light. The conclusion was that there is no aether. But here is the problem, if space was perfectly flat, there would be no light, it would curl and coagulate disperse. This is the inverse of the idea above that light is always the most irrational measure in a system of finite measurements.

I am proved incorrect, the impedance of free space is the curvature of free space, a non-zero number. That curvature and the quark mixing angle are co-defined.

No comments: