Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Not a relativistic Higgs mechanism, just a bandwidth issue

The large mass that is supposed to stabilize the Higgs wave has a variation in density going from the center out, it is made of discrete things. The Higgs boson, being a scalar does not have the frequency spread to cover the variation. The mass is not stable.   We can complicate the issue by introducing the time thing, but why? What Higgs lacks is the ability to break up its spectrum to conform to the sphere. What does Higgs have, other than the mathematical necessity of a field? It is just the most nearly primitive spectral mode. But the spectral mode, the bandwidth it manages, cannot be zero because it at least tries, according to theory.  Light is spectral mode zero, by definition I guess.

Its (weak hypercharge) U(1) charge is 1. 

Here is is, I missed that. The Higgs spectral mode can at least do the first spiral mode. It has isospin also, basically the same thing I guess. It knows about two types of phase bubble is how I interpret it.  Not a big enough to contain a sphere of Nulls the size of the proton. Charge here look to be a half wave of shift.  Spin is the motion that induces within the packed Nulls. There is no field, that is simple the first moment of swirl available after the bandwidth of light. It is simply the first moment of variation caused by the irrational number. To say the Higgs field is everywhere simply mean that when you compress the proton the spectral modes unwind and lines of symmetry go away, you count down to the Higgs mode. To say there is a mass field everywhere is simply saying that the vacuum has the Null bubble.

I am trying to go through the Lagrange numbers and identify, or match, the associated variation modes to modes in the proton. Spectral modes are stabilized by packed Nulls.  When there is interference between spectra bands, the phase balancing in the packed Null will divide out the interfering variation.  This basically moves the Lagrange number up, and adds a swirl mode. Swirl is to divide.

No comments: