More White Man's burden

The :LA Times post by   Prof Bader talks about re-segregation in California.  The major cause is new Mexicans immigrants from many years ago.  Now whites are the  minority and the prof does not mean to say whites are more segregationist than Hispanics or Chinese, we all do it.  But for some reason whites are supposed to have the wisdom to solve the problem.  Asian, Hispanics and blacks get a free pass on solving the problem. His conclusion follows:.

LA Times: There are ways to encourage integration. The Department of Housing and Urban Development has taken a positive step in this direction by requiring all grant recipients to show how they would promote integration, although Congress is threatening to undo this rule. At a local level, investment in neighborhood infrastructure, especially schools, attracts diverse residents and promotes integration. There is also new research that shows whites are choosing same-race neighborhoods not solely because of prejudice or animus, but because they don't know about more mixed areas. In a separate study of Chicago area residents, for instance, whites were 2 to 6 times less likely than Latinos to even know about majority Latino neighborhoods.

Because so much of the shift in integration is based on whites' decisions about where they will move next, Los Angeles' future demographic patterns are in their hands. If whites do their homework, and find out more about neighborhoods that are now unfamiliar to them, they can make L.A. an example to the nation of how to create integration in the 21st century. Otherwise, knowingly or not, they may reproduce the problems of racial segregation for the future.

Hillary is also a believer in white man's burden.  I have a warning, white man's burden is a very bad policy, put the problem in white hands and they will take a white cut of the action and cause bad white screw ups.