Is the Paradox of Thrift true?

When the individual engages in sudden thrift, does that individual intend to break down the economies of scale for retail sector? Is that consumer on strike against Dollar stores, for example, and does the consumer want and expect more consumers to join the strike?

The answer is generally yes, it is not a paradox, the consumer does indeed plan on restructuring the retail sector. In 1930, the consumer did intend to adopt the automobile over the street car en mass, he intended to change the structure of personal transportation.

In QM Theory we would expect a bias in the consumer toward collective action, coherency. More later on abolishing this myth; right now drinking rum and watching a movie is more worthwhile then demolishing the fantasies of economists.

Back again. Just let me say; consumers re using the latest technology to change the distribution system. It is the economists social directors who try to push us back to the past, their jobs threatened.