Wednesday, June 24, 2020

Proton electron mass ratio

I understand they can monitor the hydrogen and magnetic wobble in a cold environment and extract the implied mass of the electron.  But the cold environment implies on of the lower orbitals, and those energy levels are countable.


So, simple countability explains the mass ratio as an idea.  Thee is a point in the hydrogen atom where a higher energy level would decay faster, and one can see that point when energy levels 4 and 5 swap. One can also see that point in the Markov triples. So the number 108*17 seems to represent the possible energy levels which create a Bayesian space and the ratio is a combinatorial ratio.

The vacuum itself has an Avogadro it needs to count as a fuzzy constant which would be implicit in the countable 'rotation' states of the color operator.  ANd that should be derivable from the Markov triples. And indeed there is a 17*2 in the next electron state after a Pell node.

The phycists back the Bayesian space out from sample space, which is Boltzmann again.  But mass is in Bayesian space and the physicists are constantly driving down residual error as they map the entire combinatorial space to the integers. They are making N go from infinity down to a large fuzzy constant and they will drive their measuerment error to a minimum, they cannot count any more integers, they are in the Black Hole and need to bump dimensionality, somehow.

Inside the Black Hole the physicist is stuck, one way or the other the vacuum must change, and conservation of vacuum says the easiest solution is add a dimension, somehow.  My coral snake has some unused color selectors.

No comments: