Observations

So, the universe is a finite increasingly sparse look farther back to the  last observation and a less sparse but closer in look to a certain future observation.  But there is no reason that  observations cannot become sparser with smaller primes relative to a more primary observation? We can approach infinitely dense at the root as long as we approach infinitely fast at the farther end of Fib, and the |Fib| < 1.0.  In the entanglement, separate observers only need obey the imprecision rule to within a Gibbs.

We observe atoms because someone else observes our original black hole. I mean that at some rotation between a powerful observer on a black hole, we tunneled out with an initial prime of imprecision. We were the quants from a Hawking discrete spiral of a center flying powerful observer. We split off in the ratio of the Fib sequence of digits, definitely unbalanced.  But we still carry a trace observation of the original observer, in his next observation.

So going through a sequence, we can see how atoms might form, gaining dense polynomials as long as the first terms obey some original exclusion rule.  In the same way, collections of universe observers could find coordination into stable, say, galaxies.  As transactions continue, we become increasingly large in defining our own galaxy, by observations.  Climbing up the prime chain in the universe make more powerful observations defining future event sequences, and gaining share of imprecision relative to other observations. You know, tune into the next observation by next power up.