It is an awkward fit for them, because it implies higher level viewers if we proceed from entanglement. What we need instead is a fundamental theory of quantization, one without the observer. If one occurs to me, I will be the first to post it!
We have a much better use of information theory for economics, but here we can assume a fundamental desire to quantize on the agent, and go ahead and call it quantization theory.
In both cases we have to solve the same problem, determine the set of object sizes that maximally allow a set of objects to flow through a restricted channel. Ultimately that restricted channel is measured as the rate that you or I can exchange two goods at the local market. Once we get that limit, the the rest is organizing quant sizes such that maximum flow goes through the total assembly line.
For physicists, using the same principle, they are looking for the maximum transaction rate for the smallest quant in nature, how often can the entropy move the smallest particle across the smallest space. From there the physicist has to prove that maximum entropy flow implies a finite stage economy of scale for particle production.
So, in economics, go with a natural desire to quantize, and blame it on limitations of the brain, we comprehend in integer sizes only. After all, what economists were missing for 250 years was a theory of economies of scale; how do humans organize the production line.
1 comment:
Eventually which confined funnel is measured since the price that you simply as well as I'm able to change a couple of items with the nearby marketplace. Once we obtain that limit, the the others is actually coordinating quant dimensions in a way that highest flow goes thru the entire assemblage collection.
Cheap RS 2007 Gold
Buy Runescape 2007 Gold
Cheap Runescape 2007 Gold
Post a Comment