Romney unintentionally brought it up again. Ley us try some short logic, hey.
If a right was violated, there must have been a transaction, or anti-transaction. But one party to the transaction is government, and government always produces an advanced Lemur as its representative. By the very nature of the advanced Lemur, there was anotherlemur on the other side of the transaction or anti-transaction.
Regardless of whether the robot had it rights violated, there had to be two lemurs at the table, hence lemurhood trumps robothood. The Supremes were compelled to address the lemur rights violation, prior to robothood rights violation! The robot had its right trampled in a two stage reaction, the moneys got screwed first, then the bots.
So, Citizens United, produce the damned monkey who was at the table, we will restore its rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment