The court’s unremarkable logic was that individuals do not forfeit their First Amendment speech rights when they come together in corporate entities or unions to speak collectively. What is the constitutional basis for saying otherwise? WA PostEvery individual in the United Citizens complaint had exacty the same, limited rights as any other indiviudal in passing around media during election times. No one on the Citizens United goup ever claimed that they were personally disallowed from publishing a film. George Will, you make things up, then call is proof. Go back to school.
Nor, Don Boudreaux, did George gibe any defense of Citizen's Unit6ied, the paragaph above is alol he said, everything else was about campaign spending in general. o, Don Bourdreaux, did any individual in the case claim to have lost personal righhts. As far saw the court evidence is concerned, no individual in that case, from the Judge to the journalists to the plaintiffs ever made the case they they had lost personal rights. Don Boudreaux, it is socialism to invent thing in Washington DC that are not true.
This was a corporate contract issue be6ween Congress and a corporation, individual, constitutional rights were never even discussed. The whole godamned point of the case was there was no individual rights complaints, that is why it is made up law, Socialism, design from the center. A ruling no libertarian would ever support.
No comments:
Post a Comment