Professor speaks:
I don’t think that bitcoin will be the only blockchain but blockchain without native digital asset, to me, that is nonsense. If you don’t have a currency or a coin which has some value to reward miners for distributed consensus, and then you have to appoint validators of transactions, why should you use a blockchain which is a sub-par data structure?
His point: The distributed database structure makes no sense for existing bank structure since they will deal only with centralized databases anyway.
I can make the bigger point. A trading pit running a saving and loan bank will remember only the most significant trades anyway. A standard savings and loan will be deliberately unfocused, a bit. The money outstanding is either tradeable, in which the system has a valuer; or outstanding money is not working and will take the even money bet by default.
Why not have a perfect vision of that past? Because traders do not trade on the infinite past in the trading pit. The trading pit leaves infinity to the fools who want the task...
No comments:
Post a Comment