The debate over defense spending is teetering around a tipping point: should it be more about spending, or more about defense? The former seems to have gained the edge for now, with a preponderance of politicians on both sides spending more time talking about fiscal spending cuts, deficits, and debt than about national security goals, strategies, and threats.American
Steve Conovoer exlains why California should be erquired to pay for a defense build up that his Tea party socialists want. Sorry, no sale. If you want to go galavanting around the world in carriers, make the Tea Party idiots pay for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment