Here I have the sums of (1-tanh(n*a))^2, where a is log(phi) and n is the X axis. So this is really the sums of Tanh', the first derivative. Since the Lucas polynomials are
Cyclotomic, they have roots on the unit circle. These sums might approach the value Pi/2. They do, and get closest at the Lucas prime 29. After that, the sums stay close to Pi/2.
Here are the sums from my spread sheet:
0.8 |
1.2444444444 |
1.4444444444 |
1.5260770975 |
1.5580770975 |
1.5704227765 |
1.5751565043 |
1.5769672784 |
1.57765932 |
1.5779237128 |
1.5780247102 |
1.578063289 |
1.5780780249 |
Should we care? I am not sure. Whatever the starting angle, the series sums converge to some number since Tanh goes to 1.0. So I have to show that somehow the series sums from ln(phi) converge to a specific value of pi. But Professor Lucas may have already figured that out. I am not surprised that it might, I just want to know if this is a relatively unique series from the hyperbolic angles made of phi.
The sinh and cosh still obey this:
So any derivation of Pi from Pythagorean can be derived from this. The Taylor series of Tanh is limited to Pi/2 because this is a triangle. Why Phi work likely goes back to Lagrange.
But leave that to later. I am more interested in the differential:
sum(tanh'(n*a)) = pi/2. The residual error on that series is
(tanh')^n when the series has
n-1 terms.
N is about
7. That is a large power. It mean that light ultimately has 7 degrees of freedom, or there abouts. That also implies a big charge of six, I think, in the gluons. But I had estimated about 4, so dunno?
But this point conforms with what the physicists are doing with the natural units, they are making pi and output, not a constant. It seems all those tiny constituents of the vacuum seem concerned about getting an accurate value for pi.
It is back to sphere packing I presume.
No comments:
Post a Comment