There is a ood reason I hesitated to describe yhe actul 'algorithm' to rebalance, first, I am partly ignorany, but mostly there is a lot of freedom to choose how mutual entropy and a coding tree interact. Or, in other words,m more than one way to batch you huffman encoder to do partial rebalance, then rest. Like collecting the five least common trades in the queue, end bubbling them up. The Huffman tree is binary, ultimately, because binary is complete. But your graph is never completely balanced, there is always some marginal 'secure digit' risk.
So, I think the mathematicians have a bunch of selections to make in working the tree, as long as they can get a smooth red/green indicator of mutual entropy even when the tree is imprecise. There is plenty of room for innovation in how that tree is managed, just remember, each cycle taken by the owner is one less cycle sold.
No comments:
Post a Comment