Friday, October 28, 2016

Running the graph in low precision

Simple.  Set your search depth, that is your precision. Anything below your search depth is considered a bag of noise traders. Low precision scans reduce your cycles on the graph; cycles on the graph cost you secure digits.

But big traders will be shy to reveal their trades on the system!  Big traders do not make the trade, y\their bot does. Their bot will run the Red/Green imbalance operator and report back the optimum trade size, the size that fits into the current stream without to causing a reconfigure.  Bots, in the system, make the trade naturally.

Just always remember, pure cash is redeemable in probability of arrival, exchange of the digits guarantees cycles on the graph, and reserves cycles in the actual flow of goods. Shippers run the same system, they compare the typical sequence of goods in with the sequence of goods out, a convolution of two coding graphs.  The rule is simple, within some N bits of precision, the graph probably holds all events within a half bit of precision, and Ito, god rest his soul, will be happy.

Let's take an example

The siter owner wants yo accumulate yhe ref/green indicator between the savings tree and borrowing treer. In graph world this bevcomes:

recurse from the A, depth = 6 with fun = .recurse on B, depth =6 with fun = redgreen

This is the equivalent to, for each row,column; for each row,column, in a square convolve.nThis gets you a six bit value for red/green as accumulated by the redgreen function.  How is that scalar computed?  Probability weighted distance between two node values, my first guess.  If I plow into it, the mathematicians will have already worked it out.  My suggestion is to get the interpreter developers talking directly with the mathematicians, both being paid by the bankers.

Stays on yhis log
How important is this stuff, what is yhe significance?  I get four time he number of hits as usual when talking about self adapting systems; relative to being a politically incorrect asshole.  When talking physics I get about ten times the hits.  For you marketing folks,that tells me the work is being done, out there, and I have seen applications that perform to this model.   Mathematicians are getting the connection between semi-random sequences, semi-random graph generators and grammars. I know, I steal their stuff.

No comments: