Debating the vaccine distribution, anarchists point of view

Distribute vaccines on firs come firs serve and distribute nano particles and freeze dries antibodies and all that ASP to whoever has the cash nearby, and directly increase production on all this stuff until it is on the candy shelves across America. Make mRNA vaccines a cosmetic product. Put freeze dried nano particle in the kitchen seasoning shelf. Inhalers in a variety of flavors. Declare total war against out white cell overlords.  

In reality, this is a great sector, the benefits go way beyond covid and medicine. This is like the birth of a computing technology, and will have a doubling. Look for a bunch of specialty freeze dried in your health food store. Nasal clearing inhalers. All those spin offs are real.

Lie graphs should be a series

 The Lie groups on the circular graph is a squashed version of the Markov salad bowls, the 3D geodesic points flattened. In 4D there should be Lie graphs for squashed torus, then, similar to orbitals, a squashed object with two holes, and so on; a mapping from topology to measure theory. The key connector being relative prime theory. It is as simple as canceling the moment of binomials to the constraints dimensionally determined. There is always finite round off error and distributing that causes different kinetic axis and the number of relative primes increase, each bouncing up against its Avogadro, the maximum entropy point ordered by dimension.

Codeword for a split in the Swift chain

“Several participants noted the possibility that there may be limits to the amount of additional accommodation that could be provided through increases in the Federal Reserve’s asset holdings in light of the low level of longer-term yields, and they expressed concerns that a significant expansion in asset holdings could have unintended consequences.”

Fed minutes, taken out of context by me.  

Sandboxers should see this as yet another debate on ledger protocols by miners.  Swift will not split, Yellen and Powell both know the issues. Swift will emerge stronger, it will be jumping right in the sandbox, bet on that. There will be no 'MIT faking it', this time.

For a technologist, my model is the following: What are the abstractions of the Swift protocols that make the most flexible interface to the new contract languages, of which Swift will  one. From the total package, create the macro, mini, and micro Swift bank versions, fill in the sandbox layers. Keep the time and count limit functions everywhere so it always resolves.

Monefiscals

Progressives are raising objections to the Biden team’s pick for overseeing the transition at a key regulatory agency in the White House, arguing the official has been too sympathetic toward President Trump’s deregulatory efforts.

Bridget C.E. Dooling, a research professor at George Washington University, has been tapped to help with the agency review team at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), which reviews all executive branch regulations before they can be enacted.

Critics say they’re concerned with Dooling’s prominent role given that the center where she works, George Washington’s Regulatory Studies Center, has received funding from both the Charles Koch Foundation and ExxonMobil and has long been viewed as conservative-leaning.

This group is the same old group with a different name, the Next New Green Dealers, as opposed to Diane and the Previous New Green Dealers. We are still sorting out the entries and exits from Diane's version, AOC does not know she is debating a previous version of herself. But entry and exit happen, one funeral at a time.

John nails it

A libertarian would require competition and free entry into banking which we do not have. If people want ESG funds, there are plenty of them that directly steer investments to whatever socially conscious ends people want. The real point of the OCC rule is to try to stop the Fed from requiring de-banking of unpopular industries by inventing fictitious risks.

Fictitious risk is OCC code word for stable coins, flash loans and the rest.  OCC does not want Swift banks locked out of the new sandbox markets.

John's one other comment about free entry and exit has a corollary, all the banking theories will fail unless the condition is at least assumed in the alternatives. If you do not have free entry and exit, somewhere, then your theory has no algebra, you cannot even talk about outcome possibilities.

The alternative, monefiscals, Next New Green Deal stuff; all that cannot predict outcomes until they have a free entry and exit predictor in their model.

A philosophical note. My free exit and entry base predictor requirement is often called the libertarian premise as John noted. Libetarians get blames for a lot of mathematical requirements. If we should blame anyone, blamed the anarchists, they are the one making new chaos.

The bounded model is a fuzzy but constant market size. At the fundamental, the model is embedded in a boundary containing market of unknown size. And the fundamental answer will be the stable entry and exit congestion at the model boundary.  This is known as the error coefficient in liner least squares. In sub atomic, known as the vacuum expectation. In the general case, that is what stabilizes the Markov relative prime sets, seen as round off errors.

Run a short chain Swift register in your store

 If you are Starbucks with regular arrivals. Then your local Swift will let you down load the Swift official short chain cash ledger. Customers can move from S/L to short change option. That means the congestion manager will optimally keep your short chin full at the Starbucks for fastest speed and optimum interest flow. You get your coffee hedged, courtesy of your local Swift bank, all done over WiFi.

Customer experience. You an o onto a Starbucks today and order vi the smart phone. There is the noticeable delay in turn around, but it is convenient. Then the clerk gets the order and confirms.  With cash, digital, the order is done and appears on the register screen as soon as you hit you button. She can actually find you as you are the one hitting the phone. Each customer sees the green light of orders pending, they swap spots in line with their neighbors, they are all in sync with the system. It is eliminating that extra step, that step moves order and back, one step apart; and we can make it coincident, instant. 

It becomes like yelling across the bar for the waitress. In fact, that will happen, the customer yelling if she is ready. Then one push of the button, and her order goes up, paid for instantly. Like throwing the gal  twenty.

Their first visit with the snake

New Mexico Governor Shuts Down Grocery Stores With New Public Health Order

The virus was  discovered and we shut down before it reached many of the interior, sparse states. I noticed the effect in my hick town of Fresno.  Some of missed the snake, it got stuck rolling around the big cities, then snuck back out and hit the interior.  Not a wave, but a nasty long snake.

I digress. The difference is we can see the vaccines coming o we are more urgent to shut down. We don't care the critics because the arrival times start Q1.

Layering the coinage with due process in mind

 The bottom, the pure no arbitrage sandbox I have layering of three, S/L account, short chain cash, and petty cash.  The last category is something a qualified Swifter can carry with them as bearer cash.

What do i need to be a qualified Swifter and carry cash? I need have same thing any other money system needs, and autonomous bot in my hand. I get that free, comes from the foundry built in. Due Process steps in because if a Swifter can be qualified for limited petty cash, then it is a restriction to deny it. We have reduced the Swift system to the constraints: ledger methods, methods to make short chain cash, and petty cash is already onboaed, cannot be disabled, only limited.

Otherwise a safe abstraction of the Swift rule set can easily be fit within an app that utilizes the unknown core, handheld, biometric security.

Due Process banking is an extremely useful regulation

 Really enforced by Law within the Swift contract system?

You are kidding me, that means the constitution guarantees me the right of market priced entry and exit into any Swift account, or license. In sandbox, we assume automated discovery and hedging for arbitrage, but to haven it legally enforced by Law is like a miracle marketing tool for Swift bankers. It makers the ta dollar have even more utility than just a tax tool.

It is a two way street, this is a monopoly contract from the US chambers. If you get cheated or excluded within a Swift system, you will have an appeal process, within Swift. No other free currency can guarantee this except by contract law. Railroads and income tax agents have been stuck with this, but for Swift banking this is a great service to customers. A way to work the scofflaw problem with an internal bankruptcy, leaving the authorities out.

We can license the macro swift bank, a separate entity attached to a correspondent, but having limited time, amount and count.  Let them have full freedom, subject to Due Process. That would be their trademark, Due process banker. Keep your cash account low, under the radar, and have very low cost banking and contracts. Online biometric sign up. Offer sales lending with vendor fees, integrate anonymous, point to point, ledger swaps across he ledger space. Tie into ther Eth chain with option liquidity, put up their own proof of stake chain and sell OTC services, and so on and so on and so on.

I keep getting excited abut freeing up the Swift bankers, just to see how they do in sandbox. I have this idea of franchises, limited, but fast Swift offices. What exactly would be the opti,um market capacity of a migrating S/L, like a color operator lightening the financial landscape. A pure liquidity machine, ledgered up to valid US tax dollars.

We want to save Swift

 It is a great ledger system for the tax dollar. An ATM retail monopoly fee of a half point for Treasury is fine.

We would rather the monetarian/fiscalarian would partition their theories, they can both be true for independent agents. 

Mixing the two is friggen up the Swift system, bad news.  Technology gives us an opportunity to expand the Swift market, make it fair and available at low transaction fees for anyone. That has a value, a business plan in which we would allow an inflation tax for Treasury, over a period long enough so all parties can abuse it.  Seriously, locking up the Swift system is really a very bad idea. Freeing Swift is well worth a small inflation tax, finite renewable.

This is exactly the problem we had with radio spectrum, the problem the Nobels solved, exactly that problem.  Due Process banking is meant to be a natural, hardly noticed, universal, and neutral accounting system. We really need a better partition here, someone propose an idea. Let's make a market, Swift vs Treasury, let's find that allowable inflation tax and free Swift in the deal.

Taxes will pick up everywhere. Like wealthy whales see that regulated banking provides a voluntary path to control taxes. That is Swift is not a direct tax collector. The the whale has a Wile E Coyote because of real productivity growth within the Swift money system. That growth defeats his hedge, and he has to move his capital into market.

That money velocity is market share, we may not have a dip except the Sift system is losing market share. Velocity is moving elsewhere, including into different liquidity systems.  We want Swift to compete well, much better then the other boneheads. We want Swift bankers intimately involved with contract, verification, oracle duties, automation  and collect good fees for doing so.