Light is not a symmetric bandwidth

I don't see how we get stable quarks if light spectrum, the third moment in the spectrum of light as a sample rate, were zero.  The existence of anti-proton depends on light having a symmetrical spectrum, but these anti-particles are not too stable in the curvature around these parts.

I got bugged about this because I was working on economics from the Poisson distribution, understanding variance and skew. I do not think Shannon information theory is the last word on maximum entropy, his theory depends on symmetrical noise, and like I say, that needs to be generalized to arbitrary polynomial noise, at least up to the third degree.  We know base three is very efficient, there is no loss of information when the organization can choose the from of its own entropy function, as long as it has a finite log decoder that maps to the entropy function.

Regarding physics, we do not know enough about the constituents of the vacuum to say, for certain, that the light spectra is not skewed. Its not clear to me, nor am I working the problem, that a three sphere optimum packer has symmetrical decay times for any transition between spheres and the Higgs Nulls. But I doubt it. I think optimum packing spheres go as a specific radius rqtio, and that means their volumetric decay time, or energy holding time, is skewed between them; and that makes light asymmetrical in its spectrum, and that makes quarks. And given the astounding accuracy of light, I would not be surprised to find a fourth moment in its spectra. There must have been some very accurate positioning to get carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and the rest, and that accuracy is likely in those W and Z bosons, the weak electric.
Its time to ask the ugly question, "What is that empty space between the bubbles?" This theory only proposes three quants in the vacuum, one inert, two different and active. Otherwise it has conservation of quant numbers. Beyond that, all it does is match exponents to known physical constants, and all the know physical constants are about spheres, up to the quarks. At that point I sort of hand waved a root three Efimov like base in the spread sheet and notice it made quark spots appear, then left it. But that root three base was not a Lagrange.