How's the Theory of Everything going you ask?

Slowly, laxily.
Right now I am decomposing the following product:

Product(Ln ^(Phi(-n)) = 3.0.  Ln being the Lucan numbers from 2 to 17 (skip Ln = 2, the first Lucas number.

 The  Lucas numbers have multiplicity so I can break up the product and rearrange, summing and simplifying the Phi^n, then  take the log and get something similar to:

Sum( k* Ln(Ln)/Ln),

which is the Shannon condition, and thus the finite Lebesque integral, the summation of a finite system using minimal redundancy; and the line along which Ito's Calculus works.

I am doing this because of this, where 4 is the first Lucas squared:
4^Phi = 3*Pi

which appears in the product. I think nature is packing sphere to match free space at the boundary. Check me out, as always, but I think the boundary of the proton goes 2,1,3; which is the finite match with free space.

The Phi arrives because I have ln(Phi) in the angle of my hyperbolics, and it  the second derivative of n*Ln(x) taken at Phi, meets the Weiner condition.  Natural process is accomplish via some low order network summation, based simply on local additivity of finite things with no redundancy.

That should make the Poincare graph for some group that makes 4^Phi = 3*Pi, thus creating Brownian motion as a natural finite summation in a Poincare group.

Sort of, I am slow and fairly stupid compared to the great mathematical minds. But, when complete, we have the theory of everything.

Will I finish this?
I hope not, this is not me.  This should be a group of mathematicians who are intimately involved with tanh solution fo differentials, Fibonacci and Lucas number, Wythroff arrays and the rest.  I hope to discover a great mind among the Wolfram group, or a complete reference in Wiki.  Then I can nominate someone for the Swedish Banana and avoid having to bathe.

Then what?

Since the system relies only on minimal redundancy and rules of causality, the rules on primes will be invented to match he Laws of Organization, they will have lost their direct connection to rational numbers.  That means, graph theoretic rules will apply, and that means we can connect the theory of everything to semantic graph convolution.  But we have the rudimantary form of graph convolution over the web, its current primitive outline is the c code to the right of this blog. There is another primitive collection of c code the defines the proof of concept that we can engage in graph convolution over the web. And many advanced implementations of this graph convolution already in place.

And we get the singularity?
In about two years the web will self organize, and its ability to manage inventory will double in a few months, and the web will be connected to smart card payment systems. The result is that all inventory flow will be no arbitrage, there will be no observably better method to organize labor and raw materials for any given smart card purchase. A price of a pair of shoes will be perfectly hedged against a bond purchase by the ECB. 1930s currency technology will be completely useless, except for taxes.  The central bank becomes useless.