Circumcision is unnecessary and disfiguring?

So claims a pediatrician in the defense of two gang bozos who tattooed an eight year old child with a big fat, ugly Bulldog tattoo:

Prosecutors charged Gorman and Gonzalez with aggravated mayhem, which is partly defined as intentionally disfiguring someone. They argue the tattoo amounts to an intentional disfigurement, and therefore, a life sentence.

But defense attorneys say it's no worse than circumcision and asked the boy's own pediatrician about the comparison.

"If you have removal of a foreskin then that looks disfigured," said Dr. Carmela Sosa.

"That's your point of view?" asked defense attorney Manuel Nieto.

"I think it's a point of view," the doctor said.

What a defense? Putting a grapefruit tattoo on a kid's butt because you are an idiot practicing medicine? Give the dad life in prison.