Friday, February 19, 2016

The other contradiction with the All Writ clause

The Senate Intelligence committee considered a law making back door eavesdropping as a requirement.  The committee rejected it, as in voted no; and the full Senate obliged by procedural rules..


The All Writs is used to fill in the gaps of laws, they are issued to third parties whose property is needed to work the law, but was not precisely defined in the law.  Tim Cook is not that case at all, the Senate already rejected any writs compelling the backdoor.  The FBI request should be denied, there is no gap to fill, the Senate already decided no. The judge ruled in error.

If the Swamp passes the 'backdoor' law, then that is law, Timmy is subject to t, criminally, for his future actions.  He is ex post facto free from anything that happened before that,  In fact, there in lies another constitutional nail  in this 1789 law.  Congress cannot issue a write to compel anyone to act as if a future law had already been passed, ex post facto is built into the All Writs.  Unconstitutional through out, the clause is moot.  In other words, if the writ fills in a gap, an omission, the  the third party has no liability, his actions were ;legally valid at the time; the gap marks the ex post facto boundary.

No comments: