| 1 | Nampa, ID | ||
| 2 | Provo, UT | ||
| 3 | Boise, ID | ||
| 4 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | ||
| 5 | Missoula, MT | ||
| 6 | Sioux Falls, SD | ||
| 7 | Durham, NC | ||
| 8 | Lewiston, ME | ||
| 9 | Nashua, NH | ||
| 10 | Oklahoma City, OK | ||
| 11 | Las Cruces, NM | ||
| 12 | Greensboro, NC | ||
| 13 | Cedar Rapids, IA |
All of them small state. Why is that?
They have an internal relationships with their state capitals, regulations are mutually agreed on internally, fewer surprises.
So, with the three big states, especially given this is New York's last shot, we can see why government rotates. It cannot satisfy the asymmetrical demands, distribution highly skewed. So, via superposition, it can rotate through two or three regime changes and keep the big three in line.
But the rotation does spiral as we see from the cycles.
No comments:
Post a Comment