Do not listen to NRO, they are just catering to their sex cult

GUN LAW HISTORY IN THE UNITEDSTATES AND SECOND AMENDMENTRIGHTS 

This historical examination is especially relevant to the modern gun debate because, at its core, that debate is typically framed as a fierce, zero-sum struggle between supporters of stronger gun laws versus supporters of gun rights (who, of course, largely oppose stronger gun laws—or so it is said). The zero-sum quality of this struggle posits that a victory for one side is a loss for the other, and vice versa. Yet history tells a very different story—that, for the first 300 years of America’s existence, gun laws and gun rights went hand-in-hand. It is only in recent decades, as the gun debate has become more politicized and more ideological that this relationship has been reframed as a zero-sum struggle.

This guy is a sex cult member:

Stop Lying about the Historical Understanding of Gun Rights

And the Law has specifically stated that guns are regulated in their use.

Ownershi8p is a given. If baseball helmets are regulated then they are owned. This obvious fact escapes JIM GERAGHTY.

No one disputes that assault weapons pass through private ownership. What is clear is that deranged sex cult members, like the NRA, are not allowed to have them. It is also clear that the collective IQ of the NRO has dropped from 80 to 60 after the death of Bill.