Now I know why Brownian motion always bothered me

It is not at homeostasis, it is not adiabatic and that is why time is infinite in the thing.

This, the pi and e thing. Whenever we see those, we no there is an infinite energy assumption and time will rear its ugly head.  I am working on this, it should be  hyperbolic and account for the flow of both the solvent and the Brownian particle, one an expanding flow and one a contracting, but both at homeostasis.  A very suppressed hyperbolic motion (high Lagrange fraction). Weiner process have that infinite energy thing going. Always keep an eye out for those Greek symbols, nature does not do symbolic multiply.

But its OK to use Newton now and then, I shouldn't speak ill of the dead.  Just be careful that your grammar converges before  nature does, otherwise the boundary conditions will wipe you out. Otherwise, it is the three commandments, systems stay locally additive and connected; they are maximally divergent or minimally redundant; and imprecision matches the stable environment, and is optimally spread along the ruler. Nature makes rulers, and damn good at it.

Dealing with more than two integer connections.
Like with the higher Lagrange numbers. Doable, but I ain't yet corned the method.  I wonder if these are double and triple Wythoff game moves? Don;t they have to intersperse moves? Isn't that a nature rule? Does a bubble overlap and exchange with two or three at the same time? Mysteries, and I am worn out.