Illegal taking, right to a common defense

Millions of Americans who considered abortion a grave injustice were being asked to abandon this conviction, and not in the name of anything actually in the Constitution.

The fetus attacked the women. Her immediate right is one of self-defense, to secure a common defense or something like that. Then the states step in an violate the takings law.

This is a common law and part of the constitution. Having a Ghost and Goblin crowd declare the fetus to be law abiding is wrong. The fetus is not law abiding until it can live outside the womb, on its own. Until then, it is a criminal invading the woman's body.

This is right out of the Constitution, maybe not for the Ghost and Goblin psychotics, but they never really considered the Constitution in the first place.

Ramesh Ponnuru is plainly full of crap on distinguishing the Law. The fetus can be defended against, in the same we we can defend against a wild kid with a gun, or defend against a crazed criminal. Ramesh is pleading the position of the psychotics, and they are not in the Law..

Let me ask Ramesh. If the fetus has rights then why hasn''t the sate removed it from the woman's body and placed it in protective custody? The answer is screw you, Ramesh, get better writers, someone a bit less psychotic.