Coincident indicator vs a complete sequence

Here is the complete sequence; what California does in the complete monetary cycle.

Here is the coincident indicators, they compute the linear extrapolation based on the incomplete sequence. Basically they hold the reserve statistics constant, so their adaptive statistics is fouled.

Economists do not get the complete spectral decomposition right and make estimates with large variance. The complete sequence carries variance endogenously as a managed variable.
Banker bot does the complete sequence, and we get two self adapted probability distributions, loans/deposits and deposit/loans.  The two statistics make distributed division work in the economy and shortages are minimized.

The consumer absolutely needs banker bot ASAP, the coincident indicators are about to go bezerk and cause grey bar. For example, Illinois is in a full death spiral even though growthh has been 2.3%. So, imagine New York, only a few rungs up the solvency ladder. A 2% growth, what we have now, will through them into spiral.  Then, once New York spirals, we get a 1.75% growth and California goes spiral. When this all happens in 2016, we will all need banker bot.