He can specify a secure banker bot, just mention this web site. Then order 4 million and put Greek under a distributed banker bot price and accounting system. The Greek people will never be fooled again, the SmardCard flashes red when the price is unlikely. Hardware bot to bot communications makes for honest probability distributions, hence the Greek owner will always get the truth.
What happens to Banker Coin?
Well, last I checked, CardLogix owned 1/15 of those coins, or there abouts. So, by accepting the Greek order, CardLogix causes Banker Coin to jump in value. And of course, that makes Yahoo and Wal-Mart partners; all own equal amounts of Banker Coin.
All these vendors have know the only team set up to deliver the bot on time is the team I selected, and the team collectively owns 1/3 of Banker Bot. They have no choice but to trade or distribute Banker Coin such that the bot lands safely into the card. Since they are the experts, I know this to be true, then the bot will take the fewest steps to the hardware secure SmartCard.
Bankers?
They segment the card owners and write accounting applications that define banker bot features which generate value for the bot owners. But they know they will be writing banker bot script, as defined in these web pages. So, they are going to want a piece of Banker Coin before all hell breaks loose. Hence my team is stuck, they have to create a secure market to buy and sell banker coin, and by definition, that means getting the bot safely into the card.
Would I buy this coin?
Have all these people get in one room and open the bidding, I would buy.
Is my team doing the work?
You bet, Dannica McKellar has been working the hardware security as fermions on a lattice, when blocks of paths may be disconnected sub graphs. This is the partial encode issue where when wants frequent key updates for highly secure cards with high values. So powerful cards know more of the encoding tree for hardware access. Low value consumer cards only know a bit if it, their hardware key is valid for longer. Dannica is just continuing work on the McKellar spin theorem, so any hardware patents belong to her.
Matilde is about finishing her work on matching our fermion savings to our boson spending. She compares information efficiency between the encode path up and decode path.
Peter from Oxford! He has a bunch of Oxford math kids working out graph traversals and interface, especially the patent free tap interface.
All three collaborate on the Theory of Everything, making sure we get a great product.
And the Alternative money team has been holding seminars with bankers, finding and solving their likes and dislikes. Bankers are already working the language of credit flow, their state dependent version of the bot, optimized for our unique budgets.
Wal-Mart techies and running hard at the Tap Shopping game. This is their big app. Their currency is held by anyone doing business with Wal-Mart, inventory volatility is minimized, gains to all maximized.
The Yahoo venture group is working on this deal as we speak.
I am almost sure of of these tasks accomplished. I peg the company value at $20 million.
No comments:
Post a Comment