“I’m not a supporter of the Collins plan at this time because it brings in sequester,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said. “To the best of my knowledge, leadership of neither party supports it.”Oh, you mean that dimwitted 99 year old affirmative action ambassador to DC. My lovely one fifth of a Senator.
The sequester spending we eliminated was designed to save California taxpayer money, because as all my readers realise, poor people in California are too anxious to send their tax money to DC, they need protection. Don't forget something our bonehead one fifth senators never figured out, we Californians donate taxes to DC, DC is a net loss to California.
Who did Diane promise our CA taxpayer money to?
Murray, the No. 4 in Senate leadership, pointedly told Collins that it was unacceptable to lock in cuts at the sequestration spending levels.Oh yes, Diane must have met Patty Murray (D WA) in private and promised that California's poor are more than willing to pay for the new spending in Washington. So if Diane is involved in a plot to steal from California's poor, then who really represents the poor hispanic majority?
Senate Democratic leaders rejected the approach that had been drafted by the moderate from Maine — although Collins’s plan had attracted interest from several Democratic senators eager to strike a bipartisan deal.This lady, from a faraway place called Maine. California's poor hispanics probably have no idea that this foreign person is saving their ass from some very stupid voting. But God Bless Maine for saving California's poor from the disaster that is the Undemocratic Party.
No comments:
Post a Comment