Well, sudden outburst

California Taxpayer Group Sues to Block State-Run Private Retirement Accounts (column - Adam Ashton / Sacramento Bee)

Advocacy Group Seeks to Halt California Retirement Program (Nick Cahill / Courthouse News Service)

California’s State-Run Retirement Plan Faces Legal Hurdle (Anne Tergesen / Wall Street Journal)

California Created a Savings Program for Workers Without Retirement Benefits. A Group Is Suing to Kill It (James Rufus Koren / Los Angeles Times)

This is about the calizuela mandatory savings plan.  My thinking is, wow, I didn't know the proposal made law.  

The possibility for manipulation is manifest, that is why we are a Zuela. We utilize money as a license from the  king, giveth and taketh at his whim, and he is a union man.

But, what is the legal issue?

“Congress has expressly disavowed savings arrangements established by states for non-government employees.”

This is a commerce clause issue? Now I see a conflict here between the states right to tax and the federales right to regulate pensions.   Unless there is some flaw in the state mandate funds management, then states rights prevail here.

Why do these fundamentals start popping up?  Calizuela has become huge, electorially and economically. It begins to act independently and the constitutional bounds show up. We are manifestly Zuela, but that is not evidence.