The physicists are studying the break up of a bubble of some viscous fluid. When the bubble splits, there is a moment of singularity, according to newton's grammar. But, alas, there is the smallest thing in their set up, and at the point where Newtons goes bad, we are stuck with a small numbers of identifiable small things, and there are only so many ways to arrange them.
Think of the Standard Object model, but you create that model for each experiment by raising planks uncertainty a bit and having things bigger than a Higgs. You will always have that interface where Newton's grammar breaks down and we have to to combinatorics, and that point is relatively simple (reloatively being relative to writing an infinite termed Newtonian). At small numbers, the scientist keeps seeing the same thing.
They squeeze the bubbles through a confined channel, waddya know, sometimes two fluids, one rising relative to the pother, a two color, waddya know. We are at that nexus where number theory, and a general Linbdbladian framework might get us a step forward! Years ago, looking at fractional approximation, Markov trees, and then hyperrbolic, and kept thinking, missing theory, there is some deeper spectral constraints having to do with the minimum N to plausibly make an axis of symmetry. You have to have an axis to do Newton.
No comments:
Post a Comment