Sunday, March 23, 2014

Then the zero phase vacuum shape

There is at least this. A spherically symmetric shape which makes no exchange.  Any other phase exchanges with it, say always. None zero phase takes the Null then needs half a sample for relaxation. Moving free Nulls is power, light power.

The phases, must be uniquely shaped. How do they exchange for the Pauli minimum?  I can see the overlap, the victim overlapped and exchanger. Do they both suffer a relation half sample?  But in how many samples or dimensions can they see a phase gradient. The sample count, in gradient measured, is the Higgs size, I am guessing.

OK, we call that the highest order, mass, having largest packing code. The null count for packing size is mass and frequency. (See, in the previous post I mixed it up). It has shortest Compton wavelength.  On a spectral chart, it appears at the high frequency, high null length. It has the largest quant((3/2),k), gives you the largest F code.  Rock top massive set of packed Nulls, with the highest k number.
(This is the current standard effort to get it aligned)

The two sizes, make two phases, guessing?   are doughnut and barbell.  The change in shape makes no change in vacuum density. Then we have a unit, the Higgs size. Make it into a distance,? I think the look ahead is a very small number.  The difference becomes Pauli speed to packing distance? Not at all sure. I can the easy principle that a sudden of large phase differential would cause a balance ball.  In the Pauli speed, zeros pushed up hill, phase down.  They reach a balance, an optimum density of up and down phase, mixed with trapped Nulls, all exchanges even, and the stability insured by curvature. That is a stable result, the Nulls actually measuring the phase imbalance from the past. It is packed matter. Some brilliant group theory scientist will prove it, show the exchanges, look ahead and the algebra all work together. That would be the group algebra for Fibonacci packing. Something that converts look ahead into workable group ordering, and then we can pick combinations of packing sequences into smaller and bigger things. We get composite subtracts, adds, look ahead is a multiply? No? No divide. But the algebra generates groupings, groups of packed and partially packed mass. 


These vacuum chunks, use no energy and never wear out?



No comments: