Looking for wave length from quant ratio to get gravitrons, I am fixing an error on the impedance of space.

Note, this has been updated to fix an erro in the impedance of space.  The error I made is described here.  I am reworking this page.

A unit of mass is the inverse of  the fundamental wavelength of the order wavelength is where we left off, I think.  The total mass is the inverse of the number of wavelengths, so when we laid out the simple electron/proton pair the ratio was 1836, and 1836 wavelengths of proton more or less matched one wavelength of electron in a complete sequence.  Then we went on to convert a sparse system into a compact system using pseudo orders to represent kinetic energy and wave motion.

Using the simple mass ratio as SNR, we wanted to find quant size, and used Shannon to get:

Q per sample = log base2(SNR)

Then we pointed out, that in any complete sequence, the ratio of SNR of one particle to another was mass equivalent ratio.

The wave length increase by 3/2 for each pseudo order. So now we have the quant ratio of the magnetic and electron in a sparse world and we are going to get wavelength.  That would be:

1.5/(377) = log base 2 of (SNR+1), where SNR is the wave ratio between of the magnetic over the  electron, to an approximation.  The 1.5 is our Pauli rate.

Now, using the 3/2 ratio we find that (3/2)**14.6 = 377, 377 squared The magnetic is indeed sparse compared to the electron, but the order difference between the electron and proton was bout 18. 14 vs 18, we are getting less sparse in our world as order increases.

What about SNR? In a complete system the SNR of the magnetic is about .0039, very small. And, yes indeed, the wavelength of the magnetron to the electron will be about 1/.0039 = 377, approximately. The two methods mostly work, I approximated and did not include the Nyquist samples left over. In the order case I get 14.6, which should be integer.

 Its wavelength of the gravitron should be of the order of a light year, relative to a meter at least. That is an order of 48, relative to a meter.  That means the original disturbance in our world was mainly around the solar system. We are barely connected to the nearest start.

The red shift from gravity they are reporting is about 620/3e8=2e-6 about, this is likely the sine of the angle between our magnetic and our gravitation.. That should be mostly magnetic leaning toward the gravity.  Sine(x) is about x at these ranges, so that is about the ratio of the magnetic wavelength to the gravitational, making the magnetic wavelength about 2e-6 meters, and the electron about 7e-8.  All these numbers are off.

As an order difference, the 620/3e10 comes to about: log base 1.5 of 3e8/620 = 32, well short of a light year.   But the nearest star is five light years away.

Here they are. That is a sparse system. The density looks to be about 5 light years. A light year is about 48 orders. We are measuring about 32 orders.

Order and density are off, I need more work here.