Super fluid vacuum theory!

I don't think so. Ultimately one has causality, and that is determined in the vacuum, and set a Nyquist rate there does the trick. Beyond that, we need only determine the minimal requirements to exchange the basic thing, whatever the basic thing is. But whatever the basic thing is, you can bet that it is a zero, and to opposites, each distinguishable. Beyond that, the simple act of counting things sets up the quantum agglomeration function. And if nature is anything, it certainly seems to count well.

As an alternative to the better known string theories, a very different theory by Friedwardt Winterberg proposes instead, that the vacuum is a kind of superfluid plasma compound of positive and negative Planck masses, called a Planck mass plasma.^{[6][7][citation needed]}
Since then, several theories have been proposed within the SVT framework. They share the main idea^[which?] but differ in how the structure and properties of the background superfluid must look like. In absence of observational data which would rule out some of them, these theories are being pursued independently.