Does light push Nulls, Part 2

It is the perplexing problem.  So lets break the problem into components.
Light has a phase gradient, Dg, which gives it frequency.  Light also has intensity, Dg/Nd, where Nd is the density of Nulls at the source. The speed of light is given by the rate at which gradient can be equalized, and that is the sample rate of phase, and sets frequency.

Nulls then move forward or backward depending on the Ng of free space where  phase is maximally balanced. If free space has fewer Nulls, then Nulls get pushed forward. The presumption is that sources of light have denser Nulls regions, so the general answer is that light pushes Nulls along its path, and its path is mostly determined by the right angle between the quantization rates of that make up the light wave.

So, that makes sense, but we have to include the topology of the vacuum.  The sample rate of phase, I think, is determined by the relative size of the two phase samples, and that is determined by the relative set of vacuum over which vacuum density is equalized. Over that set, Nulls and both phases have the same density.  Thus we are required to have empty space to have some minimum of Nulls to maintain the balance, hence the quantization effect. Free space is the density of Nulls required to balance the sample rate. That determines Plank, the sample rate, and quantization. 

Everything is either balanced, or not.  Light transmission would restore the density of Nulls in free space. But, if Null packing is sparse, free space slows down as the density of Nulls exceeds the density of phase. In the adjustment, the sampling rate of phase drops.  If Null packing is dense, then free space becomes sparse of Nulls, and the sampling rate increases. That translates, once again, to the issue of Plank.  Has it changed lately?

Then doesn't the speed of light depend on Null density? No, it depends on Plank being constant.  The minimum phase direction is always the direction that restores the sampling rate, the two are interchangeable when Plank is constant.  It is still the sample issue, is Plank constant and why would that be?. Plank is the distance over which vacuum density is equalized.  One way out of the problem is to prove that Plank always seeks to have the vacuum organized in triplets, -Phase,0, and +phase. And that is again a topology issue.