Higgs vs General Relativity

The assumption of a Higgs is the assumption that the vacuum has finite bandwidth, there is a maximum density of energy, a Kmax, in terms of orders.

General Relativity assumes the vacuum is infinitely compressible.  Then general relativity gets out of any conundrum by assuming there is a middle bandwidth, called G. The vacuum stabilizes about a G. A constant G implies the ratio of energy to vacuum, over the whole universe,  is fixed.

Whether Higgs is a half wave, or a mass is immaterial, if there is a maximum density of the vacuum, then there is both a maximum mass and a minimum wavelength.  The other end of Higgs is the minimum mass that the vacuum can stabilize.  This minimum is the sparsity in which no mass stabilizes, and thus nulls of the smallest are always swapped away by their neighboring vacuum at Nyquist.

The general relativity model assumes that the global constant, the ratio of vacuum to energy, is a fixed amount of flux in a bowl. It lives in the vacuum. The constant total flux density,is distributed  at light speed, toward an equilibriumequilibrium. But it is a finite quantity.

Light is always straight at the wavefront, In the relative world, because the density of G has a direction, and right angle is defined as the angle that cause light to move down hill in the region.  Light really is the transmission of G, its redistribution, as is kinetic energy.  We see light curve because our G density gradient point differently.. Mass in the relativity world is simple directionality, we see mass because the relativity density of the flux makes mass look like infinitely curving light, or swirling G. So light, mass, kinetic energy and G are all the same thing.

In the quantum mechanic world, relativity appears as a difference in quantization levels.

So, in the one case we have bandlimits, a small and large, the is the QM world; and in the other we have a constant center frequency, the total amount of G available, the relativity world.

The B-swirls which might identify the Big Bang is light escaping from a dens world, some 300 thousand years after the bang. Its straight path is a swirl, but as it enter the less dens region the curvature becomes much less, the light straightens, int a larger, but less dense wave front, each 'ray' of light stuck with a polarization of its last moment of swirl.  The light eventually makes the large curve and comes to us and we see the various polarizations distinctly.

GR, as defined by Einstein, has a G that is a best approximation; we would never know. In fact, the vacuum never knows the value of G until everything is compact again.

Two views of the Universe, only one is true. How can we tell? Do we believe in Plank's constant. In SpaceTime, Plank is the smallest curvature of empty space and, therefore, the smallest change in G that makes mass relative to an outsider observers.  It defines both ends.

In both cases we need the mysterious disturbance. Both have the origination conundrum.