Nyquist likely binds on Nulls

I suggested the most likely possibility for the Nyquist rate was a simple relaxation time after a Nyquist sample exchanges. That means a sample that exchanges waits out a half cycle before it exchanges again. That would be a very simply, natural asynchronous clock system.

The other half of the idea would be that null sets, which have no phase imbalance, do not swap, hence have no relaxation time. That would result in a binding process for matter, one not likely to interfere.  It is also a natural outcome of a simple asynchronous clock system. It makes matter a bit more stable, and so keeps the quant system.

But it also requires some thought about what happens to the singlet zeros. It also brings up the point about the Nyquist layer randomly binding zeros. And also brings up the point about how quantization levels are maintained. It may simply be that wave motion is basically a negative, positive phase operation.It may mean that Nyquis might just be a symmetrical process. Hmm....