Friday, March 14, 2014

Higgs, Plank, Pauli and size of simultaneity

The Nyquist vacuum seeks to remove all simultaneous phase imbalances.  The Pauli vector is the relative direction over which phase imbalance can be maximally simultaneous, and the Nyquist layer reduces all Pauli at the Nyquist rate.

The reason is that the Nyquist layer is likely maximally compact, two Nyquist samples cannot get any closer. The compaction ratio is the ratio of the Pauli rate and the Nyquist rate, the minimum amount of simultaneity that can be seen at Nyquist. The Nyquist rate is the smallest disturbance that can be measured, Nyquist samples cannot be simultaneous. The minimum measurable simultaneity is Higgs matter.

What determine the Nyquist rate? A very good question, nearest answer we have so far is God. What is the Nyquist rate were variable, and determined by the density of simultaneity?  Then how is density measured? So far, he only answer seems to be that this model has a fixed Nyquist rate everywhere.Plank measures the bandwidth of space, Pauli is the outcome, and Higgs is the size. Are they everywhere the same?

A Universe that is compact has no simultaneity, all the disturbance is compacted into Null points, (matter), and orders of the compaction are the density moments of the original disturbance. At compaction, the Nyquist vacuum is evenly spread, among the Null points. Either the Nyquist rate has adapted to the disturbance, or the disturbance was originally balanced in density, or the compaction is unstable. Tells us something, not sure what.

Take the case that Plank is everywhere constant.  Then Nyquist is constant and the vacuum is always at Nyquist density everywhere.  In that case, Nyquist already knows the highest order of the Universe and compaction takes place by wave action across the known size of the Universe. That is certainly possible, the inherent delay between the Pauli Rate and Nyquist would allow the vacuum to measure the longest expanse of the disturbance even during the big bang. The highest order known, the number of orders to be determined.

There are other cases, I leave that to the reader.


No comments: