Phosphorous, essential for life

  The bottom is a nucleotide, the basis of RNA.

It has five electrons for bonding, 3 in the outer shell, I think. Tree nucleotides encode for one amino acid, which in base case is only H,C,O and  plus an N.  why three? That sounds suspicious because out quark model need three.

Ask, what would a hot steaming pond with an over abundance of reactive phosphorous do?  It would settle into an ongoing chem-kinisis; phosphorous bond breaking and reconnecting via collisions.   The equilibrium is a topology, the mix should indicate why phosphorous agglomerate in groups of three.  If we have an answer, then we can state the rule for a stable surface building process, The rule segment out amino acid combinations that produce odd destabilizing surface curvature.  We see amino acid structures as little bends in 'space-time' to balance a surface.

We get a finite set of chemical chambers, bubbles on the pond. Not life, enclosed bubble.

This whole environment, the pond, is forced by the residual weak force, the reason we get molecules.In a pond collision creates imaginary axis, about which there is uniform kinetic energy that tens to stabilize. If this is entropy maximizing then certainly amino acids would uniquely pop out of the mix along the stable Avogadro maximizing surface.  We get pond scum fls bubbles without life, just stable pond ingredients partitioning.

Really this is dimensional analysis. How do we get an imaginary axis from collisions? Because adding another force is unsustainable, so the collisions become a kinetic axis about a vertical to the collision/ It is serialized and causes another motion in spiral.  But there is a surface where the effect is neutral to the environment again. That concept is why they teach complex analysis in school because if their is a stable surface then chemo kinisis is well distributed.

But I digress. In a closed pond we get partitioned amino acid pond scum. Nothing needed except Hawkins rule, if you have flow you have quanta. This is a nice warm sunny pond with a bubbly vent.

The phosphorous in the center undergoes chemical transitions which have to match the molecular flows within the stable surface.  The general law of chemeo stasis get us most of the way there.  The remains a hole in the surface along the collision axis. The reaction in the center emit and absorb byproducts.  

It is not a stable system it requires lots of energy flow. This is not proton stability, this is seasonal stability, this system easily disrupted.  Biological life in not intended to be permanent.  But you can see the Markov topology tending to close the surface will cause amino acids to exchange position to minimize vertical motion. Their actual chemical reactions encompass most of the surface action, so that is a very stable surface, as long as vertical temperature gradient is maintained. It is all about reaching chemo stasis in an energy rich world subject to Bayes restriction of phosphorous.  This is the unstable inner tube model. Two curvatures,  when they are equal it is spherical.  Bumping into four dimensions is like pooping on one end and eating on the other. Topology guides the path in the pond, look there.

In the pond at stability, then energy in equals chemo energy out.  The phosphorous reactions must pump in consumable and excrete surplus at the same chemo rate, fueled by the sun or vents. Thus the consumable difference is stable inside the surface. The surface must be at chemical equilibrium, it is at least equally ionic bonded across the surface. or it is dying. The only thing left is the complexity of that surface, what are the residual combinations of protein relative to expected energy surplus in the mixed pond/ That is the Markov problem is the contents are closed.

The dynamics

If this is driven by phosphorous collisions at the center,then these reactions will emit and absorb in quantities in a direction direction to move the surface away from excrement, and partition the pond. Assume inputs and outputs are a random assortment of amino acids subject to their standard combinatorials.  The model should result in an unstable cell wall. The first life was regenerative, it doesn't degenerate, the phosphorous piles remain in proper combinations when rehydrated.  Not even a primitive virus.  But reproduction came when some of these changers began injesting other chambers in the wet period of abundance.   Then the phosphorous has yet another chemo kinetic energy axis, and it looks like life. The new axis makes RNA.