Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Maxwell and the axis of simultaneity and the size of the universe

I make an assumption here.  In a compact system, sparsity increases every where by 1.5 per order. The original spread of the phase disturbance is an exponential peak and that is being smoothed with the vacuum equalizer making a sign wave with phase. I assume the sparsity is large, hence the our current world is close to exponential at the nucleus going out to the magnetic. Pauli still holds, so the sparsity is exponential in order.

Now, lets define time and distance so we understand Maxwells equations.

Classical Maxwells waves moved along a defined straight line, what is a straight line?

Well, they are relative directions, relative to the center of compaction of any region and moving along along the highest rate of field curvature. At the sparsity of ur world, that mostly means straight is from the center of an atom out or from the center of the sun out. The Nyquist layer will always minimize a phase imbalance along a field where the curvature is greatest.  Remember, curvature of space is determined by the standing wave between a denser region and a sparse region, the the length of that standing wave is measured in the number of quantization steps that make up a wavelength.

What is the shortest measure of distance?  Introduce a sharp phase imbalance in Nyquist flat space and it will equalize phase out to the Higgs distance. The Higgs frequency is the highest frequency possible at the Pauli rate. So the Higgs field is always compact and represents the largest amount of phase imbalance that can be held in Nyquist vacuum, and the smallest wavelength.

What is Plank then?  Take the size of the Universe, at the big bang, which was sparse and order increase exponentially, 4.4 rather than 1.5. If the order of the Univers is 12, then it can be measured in 57127433 *3 quants. Plank is the inverse of that. When we are compact, Plank is the inverse of 129. Plank,, in our world, is measures as distance squared times mass/sec. In this model that is the number of quants per wavelength squared times 1/2 the number of quants per wavelength, divided by the second. Whats a second? Well the absolute measure of time is Nyquist/Pauli, 1.5.

Pauli is 6.62606957 × 10-34 m2 kg / s. Convert everything to units of electron wavelength, measure in an exponential sparse world, and compute the order of the universe. I am not, I want to go on.


Maxwell always assume infinite quantization  levels and the  field is flat. What is the rate of curvature?  In the Maxwell system that rate of curvature is the amount of charge that space can hold:

The impedance of free space, Z0, is a physical constant relating the magnitudes of the electric and magnetic fields of electromagnetic radiation travelling through free space. That is, Z0 = |E|/|H|, where |E| is the electric field strength and |H| magnetic field strength. It has an exact irrational value, given approximately as 376.73031... ohms.[1]
It is measured by the relative curvature of magnetism vs charge, referenced to the electron in our world. Under the Unified Field Theory, the amount of magnetism an electron field can hold is proportional to the ratio of quantization levels.  The electron field is less granular and requires fewer samples to hold magnetic wavelength, the magnetic wave uses more granular measurements and thus more samples to hold the equivalent electron phase imbalance.

Is this right? We can check. |E|/|H| =377, from wiki, is the quant ratio.  But it is not measured in a compact system. The E field is 377 times less granular than the H field, that is the relative sparsity in our less compact world. Within the atom we know the relative sparsity, it is the ratio of the proton mass to the electron mass, about 1864. Sparsity should increase exponentially from the periphery in, so taking the logs we get .16 then .13. Then the ratio should be close to the Nyquist/Pauli, and the ratio is: 1.25. The correct ratio is about 1.5. I will go over these numbers again, we need solid constants and I am barely past handwave.



these should be linear by order from the edge of the atom to the Higgs. But we need more work on the density ratios, and we can leave this for now. But we will need to get the density ratio between the magnetic and the gravity later.

Let's leave this discussion until later and get back to Maxwell in the next post.


57127433.6628623

No comments: