He voters are complaining a bit about AOC not delivering discretionary spending from the federal trough. They are saying the previous guy was a bit better. They are having 'been there done thats'.
The rule is, first, deju vu, 'Hey, this looks suspiciously familiar'; then comes 'been there done that' (BTDT) . Have the deja vu and vote in the other lady, then have th BTDT. Soros nailed it.
On a BTDT the voter has learned the complete sequence, and can commute events while staying within margin. The voter can evaluate the relative cost of federal funding for a dog kennel, vs stimulus spending vs tax hikes vs...; the voter can replay the sequence, she has the hologram effect going.
She is like the pit boss who can see most of a sequence, and it is obvious that this big depositor fits that big lender with a little grease. Keeping an active, up to date commuter function makes the velocity equations accurate.
Hologram is really a good model for all of this, thinks to the emerging gravity scientists who thunked it up.
What does this have to do with atomic orbitals?
Because, in that moment between deja vu and BTDT, the commuter is revealed and the atomic scientist can reconstruct, in his imagination, what the orbital must have looked like before AOC's voters rearranged the sequence in the collapsed the wave about the commuter symmetry. The atomic scientist get a glimpse of density derivative, the change in a compact generator. Then work the right side of the equation, what must have been the old axis of symmetry.
Or, in AOC's case, 'What were those voters thinking?'. The velocity equations suddenly work. We have a model of the typical millennials, marginal voting, gentrifying baseball player, we know how well they throw a pitch. The Hamiltonian in their pitching neural net, as enforcing upon the liklihood if fitting a sequence of neural impulses to a smooth probability curve.
No comments:
Post a Comment