Not just Boeing but also Airbus. How many software systems can take control from the pilot without full knowledge of the current flight situation.
The warning system never mentioned that the plane was put in a dive by software when flight situation did not call for it. Then sending a weird noise to the pilot instead of telling the pilot the software is in nose down. Do we automatically set reverse thrust on landing, without knowing if there is snow, rain, or ice conditions?
The Boeing 737 is not the first, the Airbus have gone into auto dive at low altitudes, confused about the complete flight situation. Autonomous software systems taking action without a complete parameter set of the current flight condition.
Software objects need maintain communication with the flight computer at all times, before any action is taken. Then the autonomous software can run the checklist, before pulling some stunt. I repeat this message, it is simple, and it allows the software to disperse objects physically. And Boeing, and Airbus, need a review of their current philosophy, it may be just that with few mechanical changes.
And the new bots do not squeaks, howl and buzz or shake. They talk succinctly in firm voices using pilot talk like, 'Fuck the plane is diving'. What do we do with that message? Communicate, communicate, communicate to all subsysems, in digital talk like:
..-. ..- -.-. -.- - .... . .--. .-.. .- -. . .. ... -.. .. ...- .. -. --.
And the new bots do not squeaks, howl and buzz or shake. They talk succinctly in firm voices using pilot talk like, 'Fuck the plane is diving'. What do we do with that message? Communicate, communicate, communicate to all subsysems, in digital talk like:
..-. ..- -.-. -.- - .... . .--. .-.. .- -. . .. ... -.. .. ...- .. -. --.
No comments:
Post a Comment