The difference between the euclidean and non relativistic. The euclidean space is a decompressed version of the Markov closed surface. Tunneling measures the error in the Euclidean R from a perfect sphere. Note they introduced the circular function to close the operators.
In Markov terms it is the variation from recoloring, when N is short. The second derivative in the kinetic energy term just gets you to a linear collapse, it relates N in a volume to N along a radius.
The effect is due to vacuum state, it is being colored. There is a natural kinetic energy because spin has one uncompressible center.
But actions really leaves the region! Yes it does, the beach ball is carrying a slight leak. No flow, no quantization, Hawkin;'s rule. Measurement cost energy. The fine constant is the kinetic energy of ground state.
In euclidean space you have made an artificial torus. Created a spot where x can go to zero thus obeying Newton's rules of grammar. In Markov units N, the sufficient number of counts is not known, locally. x goes to one and stops at a fuzzy constant.
In Markov, just put the vacuum rates into the best estimate of a 4 Tuple. Then you have an artificial one, and you can tick along in the fake 4D axis. Count the number of time N, in the 3D would roll over. Then you have a simple unitary expansion, let the round off error go to zero and get Newton, once again.
This line of thinking leads me to believe there is a 4D subtle order in the vacuum, space is toroidal. The theory defers the problem, who or what caused the vacuum to flow?
No comments:
Post a Comment