After six senators are sold,we are close enough to the stable point with 17/1 n he et and 3/1 on the right in districts per state. We are no getting this closer than 3%. There is this residual long term expense causing slow migration to rural states. Large states increasingly willing to pay the senate fee as it declines.
We get a larger set of governors who see the chain equally. Federal programs get right sized. Buying another small state gets more expensive as their districts coning two or three per, the cheap stuff already taken. And migration runs against you.
An ex vermonter, sitting on 30k per year, stuffed with connecticut would easily vote yes, do it again. Or join with Maine for a second go. But transaction events become slower than census, and migration still wins at the margin.
No comments:
Post a Comment