A neutrino (/nuːˈtriːnoʊ/ or /njuːˈtriːnoʊ/) is an electrically neutral, weakly interacting elementary subatomic particle[1] with half-integer spin. The neutrino (meaning "small neutral one" in Italian) is denoted by the Greek letter ν (nu). All evidence suggests that neutrinos have mass but the upper bounds established for their mass are tiny even by the standards of subatomic particles.
This thing seems weird. Tiny mass, no electron charge, short range force.
This too:
Of primary cosmic rays, which originate outside of Earth's atmosphere, about 99% are the nuclei (stripped of their electron shells) of well-known atoms, and about 1% are solitary electrons (similar to beta particles). Of the nuclei, about 90% are simple protons, i. e. hydrogen nuclei; 9% are alpha particles, and 1% are the nuclei of heavier elements.[10] A very small fraction are stable particles of antimatter, such as positrons or antiprotons. The precise nature of this remaining fraction is an area of active research. An active search from Earth orbit for anti-alpha particles has failed to detect them.
Going short gets you heavy.
Neutron = 1
Proton = 0.99862349
Electron = 0.00054386734
A ten fold difference.
But neutrinos are tiny and come from down there, they say. They call subatomic particles light weight. Weight, absolute weight is SNR. SNR increases to the short end. Thus, in our world, decomposing quants, we discover we can fill many thousand more samples from quants of the short nuclear world. A complete sequence, including our world, is large and counts relatively larger samples of short worlds.
Why would a neutrino seem lightweight? We assume the proton of mostly made up of some unknown Boson? with intermediate sub atomic particles. These might have be very light weight, but numerous, or somewhere in between. They are basically High speed quants moving from the Proton world at near light speed, and multiple samples per mass. The fields should be tightly looped. They slow, the field unfolds but it is mostly unbalanced, the degrees of unblanced given by the change in SNR ratios. The mostly swirl off and decay. A proton world has say, 5 bit precision, and electron has. Then on gets 7 versions each with a noticebly electron wave field motion.But make the assumption that the proton world and the Higgs would share mass space more equally. See, then the combinations soar.
Going up in scale, the next order uo is the quantize magnitron. But is the next size up the galaxy or some intermediate? If it is the galaxy, then the magnitron must be tiny with a huge gravitational field strength. If the galaxy is two orders up, then black holes are quantized gravity. With a field strength an order of magnitude higher. What was the original disturbance like?
The other possibility is that the vast reaches of space are low order quantize in small proton worlds with various versions of the standard model. And the universe is young. The Nyquist gap in samples is small, about 16, before the Nyquist noise lavel is reached.. So, if the vacuum completes the job there must be a wide spread of lower order matter, or a hug quantization in the center of the universe. I am guessing a wide and dense enough spread of low order worlds in the expanse.
Most galaxy emit light, so lower order quantization is taking place. How did that happen unless the disturbance was more dense than the vastness. The proton sub particle and the electron are mismatched in this world. The true packing ratio should be closer to to a very small number, even 1.7. There should only be less than half vacuum.
If the vacuum completes, then also there should be emissions from a spectral region to the long end of the electron, the magneto-gravitional wave, hitting us. Longer than infrared, but causing noticeable disturbance of the magnetic field.
No comments:
Post a Comment