Stars seem to be a common aggregation and have stable gravity. So the encoding process start at the proton level, very dense, the electron level, not to dense, the magnetron level is less dens than the graviton level. For a long time, the kinetic energy is greater than the quantization, the the most stable output of the solar encoding process, at the level of density, is the graviton and the proton. Gravitons form periodically from sudden appearance of multiple magnetrons, which do not survive with the electron disturbance. But tiny gravitrons stick around and there must be an unknown field, the advanced phase gravitron field.
The advanced phase long lobe of the gravitron is tightly looped. The disturbance supports star size garavitrons. We see almost all static field, and the gravitrons would be numerous, tiny and spread evenly near the surface of the sun.
So draw the actual -i*Log(i), including the kinetic energy, in the sun. The less dense, the more stable. Electrons and gravitrons less dense. Proton less dense, it is mostly packed with Boson, or more dense, I dunno. The magnitron dense between the gravitron and electron, hardly stable at all. We were packed with too much at the proton size, too little at the electron size, too much at the magnetron size, and too little at the gravitron size.
We should see constant nuclear decay into electron like objects, and consttant magnetic decay into gravitron like objects. Only in the sun do we get enough compaction of charge to make a magnitron, and that is rarely.
A gravity wave length would be of the magnitude as the distance to mercury from the sun.But a colder, more normalize start would emit shorter waves, likely osome where around a 100 hundred kilometers. As the Sun cools, it should occupy the same volume but be more efficiently packed with magnetrons and electrons getting a greater share.
The gravitatio0n field would have more curvature, and gavitational-magneto wave propagation tear apart the planets which swirl into the sun.
No comments:
Post a Comment