Formation of heavy atoms and the Big Bang

The current theory of star explosions likely will not hold. After the start, certainly Higgs mass appear, heavy and no emendable to movement. There is no gravit, and if there was we would have to wait for it before we get electrons. The first version of the standard model must have been Higgs within a dense soup of heavy leptons and another version of quark. Our world is electron sparse and gravity sparse.  There must have been short pause, the magnetic fusion created most of the atoms and electron configuration we have. With electrons stable, the magnetic field becase sparse, and things slowed down.

The standard model  certainly was different after the big bang. Higgs mass is heavy. Any model that has electrons running free while gravity compressed Higgs would not work. Higgs is a thousand times heavier than anything else. The next size down in a dens two order model are thing about 1/2 to 2/3 the size of Higgs. That would be a two order model with a bunch of lepton/quarks about 1/3 the size of Higgs.  Still to massive to be affected at the speed of gravity. We got electron sparse way before gravity formed.

 In particle physics, the baryon number is an approximate conserved quantum number of a system.

They use this as their starting point. In my model This is the Nyquist triplet measure which keeps Pauli true at all levels. The current theory resolves this into a phase +1, phase -1, and a phase zero. They have it wrong.  It is -1,0,+2, from the start. Nyquist phase equalization is the same from start to end.

After about 10⁻¹¹ seconds, the picture becomes less speculative, since particle energies drop to values that can be attained in particle physics experiments. At about 10⁻⁶ seconds, quarks and gluons combined to form baryons such as protons and neutrons. The small excess of quarks over antiquarks led to a small excess of baryons over antibaryons.

 So baryogenesis  making Pauli true.  At that point, matter was a little more common than anti-matter.  In my model has no anti-matter, but what they mean, I think, is Nyquist traps at the phase zero point more often than it traps at standing wave. Then, this theory uses increase in order number instead of  symmetry breaking, mainly because this theory was never symmetric.

The temperature was now no longer high enough to create new proton–antiproton pairs (similarly for neutrons–antineutrons), so a mass annihilation immediately followed, leaving just one in 10¹⁰ of the original protons and neutrons, and none of their antiparticles. A similar process happened at about 1 second for electrons and positrons.

This is what I call order increases. Here is where I differ. The standard model is different at this level of energy density, electrons would be much more massive, much denser, protons much less dense, a bit less massive. The relative density between the two were more balanced, even though it was a different standard model at that point.

The standard model changes, the Nyquist vacuum changes the standard model to fit the density, its a new world in physics.

After about 379,000 years the electrons and nuclei combined into atoms (mostly hydrogen); hence the radiation decoupled from matter and continued through space largely unimpeded. This relic radiation is known as the cosmic microwave background radiation.^[29]

Radiation never decoupled, it is coupled with us today. The entire Big Bang was and is a compaction in place. The vacuum is evacuating and moving to the exterior, leaving about 30% of the available Nyquist samples to maintain Pauli at the ground state.

However the current theory and this one agree on one thing, what the hell was the original nuisance that started it?

Tomorrow I will get into gravity in more detail.