Variable combustion

The case where we want a magnetic solenoids to support controlled combustion. A controlled compustion chamber operate 150 combustion per second. Fuel is pulsed into the combustion chamber such that that acceleration is bound to minimize turbulence in magnetic poles.

I am looking at a criticism of the reverse solenoid combustion piston. The reverse solenoids relies on magnetic flow through conducting bipolar atoms which can be disrupted by sudden mechanics shock.  So, then, control the shock by pulsing the fuel at high speed, rather than a single quantity.  Possible but the combustion properties must be well known and fuel injectors high speed. Steam engines can go that slow.

he other approach is a two chamber combustion with a smaller passage way between. The fist chamber combusts the total charge, then leaks it more slowly to the second chamber that drives the reverse solenoid piston.  Easy to make an engine slow enough to keep the atoms in line.

But the stoke become longer, still not much of a problem.  he reverse solenoid combustion works, it is actually a good idea. It gives you controlled electrical power, lots of it with perhaps a 60% conversion from mechanical to electric. The entire piston cycle can be controlled and maximize power output, transformers alone are 80% efficient, the the reverse solenoid is not much more than that. 

The concept still seems ok to me, the weight is all in the magnetic and capacitive storage, and that storage cost plus fuel weight is competing with the equivalent battery weight, both running the same motor.

Fair match,it would be nice to replace all the lithium batteries on a flying electric car, and get a hundred mile range.